Moving from AWS to Bare-Metal saved us 230,000$ /yr. - eviltoast
  • Craftkorb@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    To the surprise of no one. Cloud services are convenient and easily scalable - Which makes it cost effective for a lot of work loads. But for all work loads? Of course not!

    • Radium@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They barely touched on the time and money spent managing bare metal. I’d imagine that 230k a year is gonna get a big ol dent in it when their assumption of “modern servers make maintenance needs much lower” turns out to be false.

      All for not hosting in AWS but I want to see one of these articles put out actual numbers about what it looks like to run. I want the we are two years into this and have learned X, Y, and Z post. And one that isn’t written by DHH