fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoAAAAtomsmander.xyzimagemessage-square103fedilinkarrow-up1776arrow-down139
arrow-up1737arrow-down1imageAAAAtomsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square103fedilink
minus-squareiturnedintoanewt@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·1 year ago…96? How is 96 a point of reference when you are making a scale from scratch?
minus-squareMargot Robbie@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agoI think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
minus-squarephotonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year ago100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
minus-squareℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoEasier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
minus-squareJolteon@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year ago96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
minus-squareAlaskaball [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoah 7 and 9 are missing because 7 ate 9 and is on the run from the law
…96? How is 96 a point of reference when you are making a scale from scratch?
I think it’s because 96 is divisible by 3.
100 is divisible by 5, so what’s your point?
Easier to subdivide a physically measured scale when the reverence is divisible by multiple values to choose from…
96 is divisible by 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8
ah 7 and 9 are missing because 7 ate 9 and is on the run from the law