The FCC can now punish telecom providers for charging customers more for less - eviltoast

The FCC can now punish telecom providers for charging customers more for less::The Federal Communications Commission has passed new digital discrimination rules that hold telecom providers accountable for not providing equal internet access.

  • Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    TL;DR: Intersectionality is a thing and forcing the separation of intertwined issues is counterproductive as well as unjust.

    Yeah, okay, enough of this pedantic bullshit. We’re all aware. You’re not dropping some grand unknown knowledge. You keep making sweeping arguments about some general scheme, instead of you know, the conversation at hand.

    Such bad strategy, in fact, that it was probably the biggest reason within the campaign’s control that Bernie Sanders didn’t become president in stead of Trump.

    Yeah. That’s definitely it. There’s definitely not a whole slew of other things here.

    You’ve clearly made the only real point you had here, and have gone off the deep end. This isn’t really productive anymore. Nor has it been because of a staunch refusal to read what’s going on.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You keep making sweeping arguments about some general scheme, instead of you know, the conversation at hand.

      No, I’m responding to first someone who claimed that it wasn’t about race at all and now you misrepresenting that as me saying that it’s ONLY about race.

      I’m not widening the perspective to be histrionic, I’m putting it into a general context to make it easier for you to understand what I’m ACTUALLY saying.

      There’s definitely not a whole slew of other things here

      Good job ignoring qualifiers. Saying that it was the biggest problem with the campaign within its own control is in NO WAY the same thing as saying it was the only one, or even the only one within the control of the campaign itself.

      I’m not being a pedant, I’m correcting your bad faith/lack of reading comprehension interpretation of what I’m saying.

      If you don’t understand by now, after I’ve been very clear over many more paragraphs than should have been necessary or than I wanted to, you never will and we might as well stop here.