Aopen@discuss.tchncs.de to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoYoutube frontpage in 2023discuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1274arrow-down120
arrow-up1254arrow-down1imageYoutube frontpage in 2023discuss.tchncs.deAopen@discuss.tchncs.de to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareLumidaub@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·1 year agoWait, sorry, I’m trying to understand. It’s “based on a verse from Muhammad” but it’s not in the Quran? Where is the verse then? And why does not being in the Quran invalidate it if it’s by Muhammad?
minus-squarecrowbar@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoTheres quran and theres hadith, quran is infallible, hadith not so much, this “verse of muhammad” is a hadith, possibly the falsified one
minus-squareZzyzxRoad@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoEither way, it still wouldn’t make much sense for women to not be allowed to drive, but allowed to ride a horse.
Wait, sorry, I’m trying to understand. It’s “based on a verse from Muhammad” but it’s not in the Quran? Where is the verse then? And why does not being in the Quran invalidate it if it’s by Muhammad?
Theres quran and theres hadith, quran is infallible, hadith not so much, this “verse of muhammad” is a hadith, possibly the falsified one
Either way, it still wouldn’t make much sense for women to not be allowed to drive, but allowed to ride a horse.