Google Tries to Defend Its Web Environment Integrity as Critics Slam It as Dangerous - eviltoast

Attacks and doxing make me personally MORE likely to support stronger safety features in chromium, as such acts increase my suspicion that there is significant intimidation from criminals who are afraid this feature will disrupt their illegal and/or unethical businesses, and I don’t give in to criminals or bullies

Kick a puppy
Get attacked for kicking a puppy
“These attacks make me MORE likely to keep kicking puppies, as I don’t give in to intimidation from criminals and bullies that want healthy puppies for their nefarious ends.”

  • Phoebe@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work with cultural heritage and have the strong believe, that information should be open and easy accessible. Citizen have a right to access to knowledge and to educate themselves unter their circumstanses. But of course the Infrastructur cost money and this should always be a discurse between all parties. And not been dictated by major companies.

    It is a really hard fight for museums, archives and libaries lately. What do you do when your electricity bill jumps up to 5 million during the war in the ukrain?

    We need to unite and search for ways to keep the Internet accessible.

    • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can relate. People like you are the structural pillars of our society.

      I‘m not familiar to the laws concerning cultural heritage but some of the museums should be partially tax funded, no?

      • Phoebe@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks 😊

        Mostly you are right, of course it depence on the country. a lot of institutes are tax funded, but the cost can’t be covered just with that. Rent, wages, special rooms for the heritage… the new competitor is everything digital: a homepage, a database, social media. Museums need all of that to stay relevant. but the budget stays the same.

        (And of course we depent on open data, to reduce thr dependence on big tech companies)

        The war has shown how fragile this is. Cost of electricity had boomt, but there is no room to reduce it. Paintings, glas, it all needs their own temperature. But explain that to someone who is just Management. We scientist/ academics have a weak basis for negotiation, when the administration wants to save money. In my country cultural heritage is clearly not a priority, that leads to institutes having no money and losing relevance. Which is dangerous for the variety of knowledge.

        Thanks for giving me the space to shortly explain this. I think we all need to work together to make the web, the heritage accessible! 😤

        • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure. You‘re welcome.

          It’s heartbreaking how humanity treats its heritage especially given the extreme advancements of the last 100 yrs.

          If you feel like your country does not do enough, consider writing letters to your local politicians and explain the situation. Often, people overestimate the amount effort it takes to make a difference with humans.

          Good luck.