Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 months agoFBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabledwww.404media.coexternal-linkmessage-square75linkfedilinkarrow-up1373arrow-down10 cross-posted to: apple@lemmy.zipapple_enthusiast@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@programming.dev
arrow-up1373arrow-down1external-linkFBI Couldn’t Get into WaPo Reporter’s iPhone Because It Had Lockdown Mode Enabledwww.404media.coLudicrous0251@piefed.zip to Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square75linkfedilink cross-posted to: apple@lemmy.zipapple_enthusiast@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacy@programming.dev
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·4 months ago To get back the seized property, owners must prove it was not involved in criminal activity. Well, that just sounds amazing and not at all exploitable
minus-squareScrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.techlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·4 months agoSeems a bit opposite of the whole “innocent until proven guilty” thing
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 months agoSeized property under rico works the exact opposite, you have to prove your property innocent.
Probably not.
Well, that just sounds amazing and not at all exploitable
Seems a bit opposite of the whole “innocent until proven guilty” thing
Seized property under rico works the exact opposite, you have to prove your property innocent.
Lol