Double blind win (by skeletonclaw) - eviltoast
    • IanSomnia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No he didn’t. You don’t have to know that you’re taking a placebo for it to be a placebo. You just have to know you took something. Most people think the placebo affect is negated once it is revealed you have taken a placebo. His comment highlighted that the effect can persist despite ones knowledge that it is a placebo.

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just remember that the placebo effect is only effective in a small percentage of the population, and is consistent with any other substances that may induce this phenomenon. That’s how they know when something actually works…it works in the majority of people, not just that small percentage.

      • LurkyLoo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that’s not quite it. Placebo is actually present for most/the majority of people, but they (researched of various kinds )are looking for effects that are above and beyond the level demonstrated by the placebo alone.

        One fun thing to think about is that most (maybe all) treatments include some degree of placebo effect inherently.