Twitter seeing 52% of its links removed on google after user requirement change - eviltoast
  • dotfiles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    124
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    I don’t think google is doing that on purpose. Search engines are supposed to remove dead links once in a while. And twitter redirecting all links to the login page, so it’s effectively making duplicate results on google, which are removed. I think that’s why google doesn’t have too many Linkedin results.

    • Rhaedas@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      I remember the fear as a web developer in making sure changes were good before going live for this very reason. “Please don’t screw up the Google bot crawler and drop the search placement.” I’d love to know if Google searches hitting private Reddit pages did a similar thing.

      • Bushwhack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        No. Private subs still showed the topic part of the body and like 4 words of the first comment I think before clicking to see you couldn’t read more. I think r/Homekit is an example of this at one point….

        • jecxjo@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 年前

          Think they also did all the other SEO stuff like put in extra data with meta tags and all that open search stuff.

        • Rhaedas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 年前

          That’s what I figured. However perhaps Google is still looking at how long one stays at a link, and a click right back is still negative.

          • fiat_lux@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 年前

            Google does measure bounce rate and preferences sites which don’t turn away users quickly, it’s a decent measure of search saliency. Whether the effect is significant or lasts long enough to bother Reddit’s accountants is another matter. It also may not be enough to affect their SEM bid multipliers by much or rankings in structured content sections.

            I suspect the extended protests hurt quite a lot more than they let on though.

          • Bushwhack@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 年前

            I read elsewhere too that part of googles automatic pruning of results also looks at if a web page responds and at one point Twitter was ddos itself so they think a no reply may have auto taken it down like a webpage suddenly going offline.

    • grahamsz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      Well yeah, it wouldn’t be 52% if they were doing it on purpose.

      How did the twits possibly not foresee this happening? Surely they have someone with some SEO experience left, anyone.

      It’ll take a while to recover from this - google aren’t going to add half a billion pages back in nearly as quickly as they take them out.

      • whofearsthenight@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 年前

        It really doesn’t matter if they have anyone left that knows anything about anything. All reports thus far is that anyone not giving the ol’ “aye captain” any time Elon says anything gets shitcanned. I’m sure there is someone there that probably went “but, sir…” before immediately getting shut down.

    • nobodyspecial@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 年前

      Odds are it was written by ChatGPT or similar A.I. Been seeing a LOT of articles with odd mistakes or written in “A.I. voice” lately.

    • Cordoro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 年前

      Do you mean to tell me that a website called “boing boing” isn’t only written by the utmost professional of journalists?

      • Axellon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 年前

        Boingboing has been around since the earliest days of the web, and used to be one of the biggest sites and well respected. Scrolling through it now is pretty sad.

  • voodooattack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    Why does that page read like a personal attack? Don’t get me wrong, with his latest blunders, I don’t like Elon either; but this “article” seems too unprofessional to cite here to me.

  • Griffith@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 年前

    Intercom turns on

    “Great people of the first Mars settlement, your glorious leader comes to you from Earth with an important message about this month’s oxygen supply.”

  • polizeros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    The internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

    That’s exactly what is happening now.

  • fiat_lux@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 年前

    I refuse to click this link purely for the AI-generated macho-man thumbnail alone. The internet is turning into a series of weird stylised God-figure portraits, and I am not enjoying it.

    As for Twitter, I suspect that the ham-fisted emergency rate-limiting implementation probably didn’t remember to allow SEO spiders. This would be an expected consequence of preventing the platforms you rely on for traffic from providing their users reasons to give you traffic.

    The part that annoys me about all of this is that Musk will experience no consequences from stomping all over Twitter like a selfish mean child with a sandcastle. I feel badly for the people who worked there and sacrificed their time to work there.