Then and now - eviltoast
  • SCB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When I was 18 I was pretty dumb, yeah. I once totally destroyed a hard drive by corrupting a file trying to make my PC background the “Anal Destruction” website logo

    Young people are dumb man.

    • NOSin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, so you missed that what OP talked about was very real. We had much more of those sites based on sharing, and they were much more at the front of the internet.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There were absolutely not more websites based on sharing in the early 2000s lol

        You are literally on one of the very many websites dedicated to it, today, while bemoaning it’s absence

        Some of the sharing sites from the 2000s monetized themselves and that upsets you. I have no issue with that. There are many alternatives because what he said is false. Go use one of them.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bro that’s anecdotally false, there were so many ham, electronics and random research sites I perused on angelfire and geocities.

          Quality varied greatly, but lots of thought went into making posts, diagrams were sometimes done in ASCII art which was its own headache.

          Point is, I don’t agree with your take, and I don’t think my similarly aged friends would agree either. Internet of late 90s/y2k wasn’t an ad-free utopia, but the point was more about conversing and sharing info.

          Lemmy is an attempt to return to that original intent, modernized as it must be.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You may want to give “HAM radio forums” a Google.

            I don’t care if you agree. I care what’s correct. The Internet is many times larger than I was 20+ years ago, and all the same free networks exist. The really popular ones got big and monetized.

            That’s just how success works with anything.

            • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hmm? Your argument and thinking processes both seem clouded.

              Ham radio forums still exist, as they previously did. Did you miss the gist, that information exchange was more of a prime focus vs making money by cramming ads everywhere? Obviously yes.

              • SCB@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Except it isn’t, and all those resources exist for free.

                The Internet was once a niche space as a whole and now it is a large, omnipresent space with more niche spaces than before

                It’s really not complicated. This is just Boomer Humor for millennials.

                • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Very nice, would you like a cookie? Now that your hangry has been settled, try clarifying your murky premise again.

                  Mine is that the ratio of websites that freely shared info vs those that did so with an underlying goal of making revenue by advertising was very large vs very small.

                  “Boomer humor for millennials”? I’m laughing, but not for the reason you’d hoped for.

                  • SCB@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Mine is that the ratio of websites that freely shared info vs those that did so with an underlying goal of making revenue by advertising was very large vs very small.

                    This is still true.

                    The paid websites are simply more advertised.

                    No idea where you’re going with the rest.