The contributing stopped when you tried to argue against tolerance on a post literally about the paradox of tolerance. That was about 60 comments ago, bro.
Actually, for an honest answer, this guy’s post history is incredible for an account that’s just 9 hours old. He’s a condescending loser with a lot to say when it makes him feel superior.
We had an argument earlier about tolerance and the social contract, and he made it very clear that he exists to spite tolerant people specifically.
And then I realized how hard he tries to win arguments (that he claims he’s never argued!) and how quickly he deflects when he’s losing them. So I decided to see how far it goes.
He’s honestly quite fascinating. Might be the most prolific troll I’ve ever met.
The contributing stopped when you tried to argue against tolerance on a post literally about the paradox of tolerance. That was about 60 comments ago, bro.
Removed by mod
Playing dumb doesn’t suit you. You’re better than that
Removed by mod
You don’t answer mine either. We’re past those kinds of rules, given that you made it abundantly clear that you don’t abide a social contract.
You’re a troll. Why engage any more than it’s an advantage for me?
Removed by mod
Different words, same stonewall. Not original. Try again
Oh Lord what happened here
Actually, for an honest answer, this guy’s post history is incredible for an account that’s just 9 hours old. He’s a condescending loser with a lot to say when it makes him feel superior.
We had an argument earlier about tolerance and the social contract, and he made it very clear that he exists to spite tolerant people specifically.
And then I realized how hard he tries to win arguments (that he claims he’s never argued!) and how quickly he deflects when he’s losing them. So I decided to see how far it goes.
He’s honestly quite fascinating. Might be the most prolific troll I’ve ever met.
Just agitating a troll. Don’t mind me