cm0002@no.lastname.nz to Displays@programming.dev · 2 months agoThree year test shows OLED is significantly more reliable than LCD, with most lasting more than 10,000 hours — 20 TVs failed out of 102 testedwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down11cross-posted to: hardware@programming.dev
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-linkThree year test shows OLED is significantly more reliable than LCD, with most lasting more than 10,000 hours — 20 TVs failed out of 102 testedwww.tomshardware.comcm0002@no.lastname.nz to Displays@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square7linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hardware@programming.dev
minus-squaremindbleach@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoBurn-in is still a problem, though. For actual television - not an issue, unless you leave CNN on all day every day. (What, do you live in an airport?) For a computer display… yeah, that’s gonna show up.
minus-squarecm0002@no.lastname.nzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoSeems to have been mitigated as well https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/gaming-monitors/after-15-months-and-3-800-hours-of-worst-case-usage-one-independent-test-finds-oled-burn-in-is-now-almost-a-non-issue/
Burn-in is still a problem, though. For actual television - not an issue, unless you leave CNN on all day every day. (What, do you live in an airport?) For a computer display… yeah, that’s gonna show up.
Seems to have been mitigated as well
https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/gaming-monitors/after-15-months-and-3-800-hours-of-worst-case-usage-one-independent-test-finds-oled-burn-in-is-now-almost-a-non-issue/