“Professors like this are the very reason conservatives can’t voice their beliefs in the classroom,” the group posted.
The virtue signaling is on point. It’s interesting that the assignment wasn’t to share her beliefs, but to assess the student’s ability to absorb and understand the scientific premise of the paper. You can hold your beliefs and still do that, but she chose to ignore it, failed the assignment, and then posted it to the media to call down the wrath of Charlie Kirk’s ghost.
This truly is the dumbest timeline, but then again, this was in Oklahoma.
The virtue signaling is on point. It’s interesting that the assignment wasn’t to share her beliefs, but to assess the student’s ability to absorb and understand the scientific premise of the paper. You can hold your beliefs and still do that, but she chose to ignore it, failed the assignment, and then posted it to the media to call down the wrath of Charlie Kirk’s ghost.
This truly is the dumbest timeline, but then again, this was in Oklahoma.
and it’s psychology. What they call “science”.