Google is already pushing Web Environment Integrity into Chromium - eviltoast
  • fuser@quex.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yes, it is a nightmare. The insane volume of ads and clickbait injected into web pages is killing the internet as an information source. Most of the searchable stuff is unusable. Which explains why ChatGPT was so enthusiastically embraced - it’s really just synthesizing content into a readable form that doesn’t require navigating around a jungle of animated gifs and flashing ads. That’s also I think why Lemmy and Mastodon are so refreshing to use, and hopefully will stay that way - although money seems to find a way to ruin everything. Lemmy right now feels a lot like the internet used to be before the big money came along and ruined it with advertising and platform lock-ins.

      • fuser@quex.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://andisearch.com looks like it might be a better option - thank you so much for posting. I’m mostly using duck-duck-go which is tolerable but by this point we should have come up with a more useful way to index relevant information. Google would rather we see ads than any relevant content, which wasn’t the case when they first launched google in the late 1990s. Google was refreshing at the time because of its cleaner interface than yahoo and uncluttered results, amusingly enough - it’s a far cry from what it once was.

        • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          @fuser, Andi certainly is a fresh wind, it was the first search engine with AI which appears, before Google, Bing and the others. Great work of two very nice and friendly devs, Angie Hoover and Jed White, with an open ear to the user in their Discord channel for suggestions, feature request, bug report (well, it’s still in developement) or simple chat.

          • fuser@quex.cc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, thanks again for the info - I’m trying it now and the results seem excellent, it took me to wikiwand, which I’d never used but it’s a front end for wikipedia - it’s quite nice. I’ve learned so much about alternative FOSS and great ad-free content by reading and posting here. I was never a great fan of reddit - liked to scroll but hardly ever posted there - I thought RPAN was the coolest thing they did - but Lemmy is great for conversation, despite the relatively small user base - I’m grateful that reddit’s nonsense drove so many helpful people here.

            • Catweazle@social.vivaldi.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              @fuser, the fediverse has nothing to do with monolithic social networks, controlled by large multinationals. It doesn’t matter if you use an instance of Lemmy, Friendica, Diaspora, or Mastodon. etc., are really of the people and independent of large corporations and linkable with each other. Here in Mastodon I see posts of all these in my Timeline and I suppose you too, like the one where I am.

              • fuser@quex.cc
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I didn’t notice that you were posting from Mastodon as I’m on Lemmy and your posts appear here just like any other Lemmy user - but the @fuser at the start of your messages is probably the tell, I think Mastodon defaults the username you’re replying to, whereas Lemmy doesn’t. It’s great that we can use different applications without some corporate gatekeeper capturing everybody’s personal info at the integration point to hawk to an advertising company.

    • Danny S@social.vivaldi.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      @fuser @Lem0n Regarding articles, I just save them to a read-later app that strips them of all the crap. If the site won’t let me, I’ll find another source reporting the same information, and save it to read later. If this process ultimately fails without a saved page, I won’t read the article.

      • fuser@quex.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Right - that’s a good approach, however if you’re looking for a quick answer to an immediate question by searching using a common search engine, the garbage SEO pages are the most irritating, even with adblocking.