What would you do with 100 billion dollars to have the most positive impact on the largest number of people? - eviltoast

My partner and I were discussing this over dinner, our ideas went from buying up land to finance organic farming and distributing it at the lowest price to crashing the financial system to “reset” everybody’s bank account with no possible recovery. Any other ideas?

  • blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    200,000,000,000 / 200,000 = 1 million homes.

    There are about 140 million homes in the USA.

    You have ~2.5 people per home in the USA.

    You would essentially be able to buy everyone living in Chicago or Houston their own home per population.

    Chicago, IL (Population: 2,670,406)
    Houston, TX (Population: 2,378,146)

    • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I would rather work with a builder for higher density housing simply because the money could be stretched further. We need to rethink the concept of housing and homes.

      • Instigate@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’ve touched on a great point as to how some of the money should be spent - finding the brightest people with the best ideas and adequately funding them. Yet another folly of most billionaires is that they think they have all the answers; if you’re able to eschew that idea then you can really get some serious bang for your buck by not going full-blown Elon with the Captain’s Calls.

      • VediusPollio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bet you could buy a lot of teepees with that money and increase the curb appeal of tent cities.