Unpacking Google’s new “dangerous” Web-Environment-Integrity specification - eviltoast
  • randomaccount43543@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Guys, if you don’t like these proposals from Google, you need to switch to Firefox now! It’s the only way to defend freedom on the web!

    • Nevoic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Over 85% of Mozilla’s income comes from their Google search deal. Google is keeping Mozilla alive to prevent antitrust issues. If Mozilla rocks the boat too much, Google will fund a more obedient alternative.

      • Goodie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So your answer to “Google is evil use another browser” is… if we all swap to Firefox google will kill it?

        Google is keeping Firefox alive because 5% of all web users using Google search by default is pretty useful for them.

        If you want to avoid that, simply use firefox and set your search to DuckDuckGo/Bing. If Google drops them, Microsoft have already shown a want to step up into that position.

    • mrmanager@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      About 5 years too late but appriciated still.

      People just don’t listen or care. They click on chrome because it’s recommended by their daddy Google.

    • Imgonnatrythis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you pushing Firefox when Vivaldi did the work of writing this article and Vivaldi has consistently been pro-user, pro privacy, and anti-google even while using Chromium as their backbone. Viva Vivaldi.

      • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        Using any chromium fork is supporting chromium as the default browser, and choosing gecko-based browsers means you throw your hat in the ring to show websites that not just chromium browsers visit them. Using a chromium fork also means you accept that google will dictate standards less harmful than web integrity. While it’s not the end of the world, the last time this happened IE9 happened. Using Firefox means google can’t simply decide to implement any spec they want and that spec becomes true because all user agents have it (exactly what is at risk of happening here. Vivaldi may make nice blog posts but if this ends up happening they’ll be happy to implement it else risk losing their entire user base)

        The would have been an argument to be made about performance but nowadays blink and gecko are pretty much at the same performance level.

        • Kayn@dormi.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Using a chromium fork also means you accept that google will dictate standards less harmful than web integrity.

          Are these condescending statements how you intend to get people to switch to Firefox?

      • pfannkuchen_gesicht@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it’s better to support a diversity of web render engines instead to avoid a situation like back in the days with IE.

      • Name is Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have used Vivaldi and even led my kid to use it, but I still always go back to Firefox and/or LibreWolf for peace of mind and extensions like uBlock Origin and Anesidora.