Ah k, this was my understanding of running an alternative OS. Like I thought no matter what you run, Apple was still keeping supervisory control regardless. But I was thinking of this more in-line with what Cross-Over/bootcamp/wine etc do roughly speaking.
You can run another operating system inside OSx, but that’s a virtual machine, an entire virtual computer which you then install the other OS on.
You can also just install an OS an the actual computer. There is no way to make doing this completely impossible, and with professional hardware used by actual software professionals, trying to would be utterly unacceptable. Apple would lose an entire type of customer.
Even with game consoles, people like to circumvent the blocks around doing this and run whatever they want, for fun.
I think I was thinking more like how Apple doesnt want Hackintoshes (Mac running on PC?) as opposed to this up-to-date characterization you are running off of
You lost me again. Hackintoshes exist, and the only way apple has to stop them is the legal code around software licensing.
How is that relevant?
Apple can legally stop you from running OSx without a license, because you don’t have a license, but they cannot stop you from running whatever you want on your hardware.
Apple can’t attach a license to hardware, limiting what you are allowed to do with it. That would be stupid.
Ah k, this was my understanding of running an alternative OS. Like I thought no matter what you run, Apple was still keeping supervisory control regardless. But I was thinking of this more in-line with what Cross-Over/bootcamp/wine etc do roughly speaking.
You can run another operating system inside OSx, but that’s a virtual machine, an entire virtual computer which you then install the other OS on.
You can also just install an OS an the actual computer. There is no way to make doing this completely impossible, and with professional hardware used by actual software professionals, trying to would be utterly unacceptable. Apple would lose an entire type of customer.
Even with game consoles, people like to circumvent the blocks around doing this and run whatever they want, for fun.
I think I was thinking more like how Apple doesnt want Hackintoshes (Mac running on PC?) as opposed to this up-to-date characterization you are running off of
You lost me again. Hackintoshes exist, and the only way apple has to stop them is the legal code around software licensing.
How is that relevant?
Apple can legally stop you from running OSx without a license, because you don’t have a license, but they cannot stop you from running whatever you want on your hardware.
Apple can’t attach a license to hardware, limiting what you are allowed to do with it. That would be stupid.
I need to shut up now aha
Careful, bootcamp is running the is on bare metal. This is what you are asking for. The others are different and run ON macOS.
Can you elaborate on this?
Bootcamp is basically a software tools that helps prepare the installation of the different operating system (like Linux or windows) on a Mac.
It will create an install image, it will prepare a system partition and provides windows drivers for the hardware