The suffering is inherent, and intentional to RULE system - eviltoast

The Democracy of the founding fathers was Greek Democracy, predicated upon a slave society, and restricted to only the elite. This is the society we live in today, even with our reforms towards direct representation. The system is inherently biased towards the election of elites and against the representation of the masses. Hamilton called it “faction” when the working class got together and demanded better conditions, and mechanisms were built in (which still exist to this day) that serve to ensure the continued dominance of the elite over the masses. The suffering of the many is intentional. The opulence of the wealthy is also. This is the intended outcome.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brain dead take, capitalism always ends in the consolidation of capital and power. It naturally flows resources into fewer and fewer hands as the only goal is to make more and more profit. We’re living in it and you’re denying it. Take a look around you.

    • bassomitron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently you didn’t actually care to read what I wrote and comprehend what I meant. I am specifically calling out the system we’re currently living in.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I did. The true long term goal for our species should be eliminating our reliance on monetary systems. Money is just a tool for inequality at this point.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t necessarily disagree, I just don’t think it’s realistic for a long, long time. Humans will require an evolution of sorts for anything like that to occur. You’d need the vast majority of humans to stop being selfish/entitled. That’s never going to happen without dramatic change. In small pockets of society, e.g. communes? Sure. At scale in places like NYC, Delhi, London, etc? No way.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re ultimately right. Though, as you said in current mentality, if there is a way to be more equal someone will do it. Civic centers like that would have to be reformed after whatever new way lf things comes next. I’d imagine our descendants will have to squat in our ruins before that also happens.