[meme] Just one more lane bro - eviltoast

Image transcript:

  • caption: “state DOTs presenting their groundbreaking solutions to traffic”
  • image: stock photo of people in business attire holding up a poster together with the text “just one more lane bro”
  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I love this logic.

    How do we fix traffic in our city? Add another lane to the freeway. Okay, but to do that we’ll need to shut down 3 of the 4 existing lanes for traffic. During rush hour, of course. Yes, the traffic will be even worse during this time, but we’ll have the traffic fixed once the new lane opens up! We project that the construction will be finished in 5 years. But rest assured, it’ll take 10 years. And that new lane will be a toll lane, so nobody will even be using it.

    Austin is an absolutely terrible city when it comes to this sort of nonsense.

  • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    My state’s DOT measures success by Vehicle Miles Traveled. The more driving people do, the better the DOT is doing. Sprawl? Line goes up! One more lane? Line goes up!

    • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, that would explain a lot about why state DOTs are often so garbage. Sounds like a good example of Goodhart’s law:

      When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure

      In this case, trying to use VMT as a measure of success just means they’ll favor projects that needlessly sprawl, instead of more compact or transit-oriented options.

  • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are in the process of doing this in NJ and it’s infuriating. The approach to the Holland Tunnel, which is busy (understatement), they’re adding another lane, as though that will somehow be the solution. And I can say with some authority that anyone who drives the Turnpike Extension through Jersey City, majority of those people are going to continue on if their destination is Manhattan. It is an absolutely boneheaded move, with plenty of public opposition, but they are chugging along. Smells like corruption to me.

    At the very least there are funds allocated and ground has broken building new train tunnels into NYC, but it’s bittersweet knowing billions are being wasted widening a road that doesn’t have a capacity problem so much as it has a 100 year old tunnel at its termination.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    “We’ll just put roundabouts instead of stop lights, it’s how Europe does it.”

    • FarFarAway@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Serious question though.

      How do people deal with exiting these roundbaouts in Europe?

      Nobody in america uses them (edit in: turn signals) when exiting and im stuck there waiting for a spot to clear, or until someone decides to let me know theyre exiting. It doesnt help theyre the smallest roundabouts they could possibly make. Everyone behind me gets mad, but just entering is like playing a game of chicken.

      Do people in europe have the same issue, and they’ve just learned to time it better / have more space between entrances and exits, or are people more courteous, and use their damn turn signals.?

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          BMW and Audi drivers on this side of the pond. Hell, I almost walked in front of some sort of massive SUV last night because the fucker turned left, while blowing a stop sign, with no turn signal.

      • eendjes@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        You just exit them? It’s the people getting onto a roundabout that have to wait.

        • FarFarAway@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Right, but do you use your turn signal to exit, or do you just exit?

          Sry just realized it sounded like no one exits. Haha opps.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            when driving on the left (eg UK), if you’re making an exit on the left side of the roundabout, you signal left and get in the left lane, if you’re going straight you don’t signal and can get in either lane, if you’re going right you signal right and get in the right lane, then signal left to exit

            reverse for driving on the right (eg USA)

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do roundabouts flow both clockwise and counter clockwise in the UK? They only flow counter clockwise here, so you’d always exit to the right. The left lane is the inner most lane, and hence there’s nowhere to exit to. Unless you are one of the frequent rednecks that just go straight across in your massive truck/SUV.

              • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                perhaps I should have specified, my example was for left-driving traffic which travels clockwise in the UK. in the US its right driving traffic traveling widdershins on roundabouts.

                assuming you approach the roundabout from the south, heading north, and you’re driving on the left, traffic travelling clockwise on the roundabout. the first exit (west) would be “left”, the second exit (north) would be straight on, the third exit (east) would be right, and the fourth exit (south) would be essentially a u-turn

                as you approach, intending to turn east (left) you signal left, if youre intending to turn west (right) you’d signal right. Once you’re on the roundabout, if turning east (left) you’re already signaling left so you exit left, but turning west (which was right as you approached the roundabout but is now left from your POV) as you approach your exit you signal left to exit.

                • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ahh, I see what you mean now. I was thinking relative to the car as the absolute point, not relative to the interchange. Gotcha.

      • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        People should be signalling before they leave, but I’ll give you a tip from a country that uses roundabouts.

        Look at the front wheels. Where are the front wheels pointing?

        The front wheels will tell you where they are going quicker and more often than people’s turn signals (which are unreliable).

          • HydraulicMonkey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ll give you a better tip for all traffic interactions; look at the driver not the car. You can see where they are looking and what they plan to do in almost all situations. You can even see if they aren’t looking and have no plan.