Australian public school funding falls behind private schools as states fail to meet targets - eviltoast

Calls for special deal to be struck for NT, which has biggest funding gap between public and private schools

  • billytheid@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No. If your school turns a profit you get nothing. No more corporate welfare

    If your school mandates a religion you get nothing. God Will provide…

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am ok with the government giving money to private schools. I personally never went to one, and my kids don’t either.

      But every kid is entitled to $x per year funding. Some parents are rich enough to contribute more above that, but they still entitled to the same government funding that every other kid gets.

      You can’t on one hand say ‘tax the rich’, then a minute later deny them services. That would be unfair.

      • UnknownQuantity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The rich people’s kids are entitled to public education.

        If you make education system based on class you’re going to deepen the social divide. This is already happening. People in power will advocate for private schools because that is where their kids go.

      • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But every kid is entitled to $x per year funding

        According to the ABC, independent private schools average $10k per year per student and public schools $14k per year.

        AFAIK The exact amount a private school gets depends on how affluent the families are estimated to be (estimated by the government - not the school).

        The reality is if every kid went to a public school, we’d have to significantly raise taxes to cover the additional cost (we’d also have to open new schools). I’d probably be in favour of that, but not everyone would.

          • Ilandar@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t consider funding a service, but for argument’s sake let’s pretend it is. Those kids still have access if they attend a public school. Though I suppose that would mean they’d need to mix with the “poors”, how terrible for them.