Cities: Skylines II - Performance, Post-Release Plans & Goals - eviltoast
  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it shouldn’t be released if it needs a disclaimer. People are fed up with half finished games being sold at full price with “promises” of fixes in the future

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So much this. Because optimization part is not guaranteed to come. There are many number of other developers who have done exactly this. Promise specific things, you purchase the game only for them to go… yeah about that optimization thing, it’s far easier if we just change minimum requirements and let the hardware grow into it. After we’ve already paid of our investment.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. I don’t trust any game publisher to invest the time and money into fixing ‘minor’ performance problems when people are still buying the game. As long as people continue to buy games that aren’t complete at launch we’ll continue to get games that aren’t complete.

        • st0v@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yhey optimized and expanded the last CS game for like ten years. It was driven by DLC but the entire time CS vanilla was getting fixes and improvements.

          There were some pretty lame limitations to the core simulation that stayed there the entire time but at least the devs were pretty open about having no plans to change them.

          The CS2 story won’t really play out entirely for a year or two yet.

          • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you had an option to pay the full price in installments then such excuse would be acceptable to a degree. As it stands now you bought what’s made and then some plans on top of that. Plans that might not come. Sure developer might be trustworthy but they have no legal obligations to fulfill those promises.

            • st0v@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              yeh but I got ten years of a really great game, with a really great community. It took a long time for me to care that the lane change mechanics weren’t optimal.

              that ten years buys a fuck ton of good will for me. Life doesn’t run on legal obligations.

              • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Great game part is not guaranteed. It’s not finished yet. Also it might get worse in some of the future changes.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the game is well known not to be finished, they should have sold it as Early Access.

      Non-functional requirements are still requirements.