Murena launches phone with hardware kill switch - eviltoast
  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Niche product, niche price, nice intentions, sure. But if they were going to go for a niche market, they really should have leaned into it.

    Things like a headphone jack, removable battery, and not-gigantic display aren’t unrealistic beauty standards. They were perfected over a decade ago and still relevant among sub-300 phones from small-time manufacturers.

    Also, the modem is the big unauditable black-box component that should have been the subject of the hardware kill switch.

    • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They say:

      – A hardware kill switch; disconnected completely the microphone and cameras at the circuit level, leaving nothing open for intrusion.
      – A software-based switch, to easily turn off all your radio signals, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and NFC.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I feel like it should be reversed? Id be less concerned about camera/microphone if i knew with 100% certainty no data was leaking from the phone (hardware switch for antennae).

        • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It seems like it’d be relatively simple for a bad actor to record something and just… wait until you had a data connection though wouldn’t it? Seems like it’d be more secure to just keep there from being any data to send rather than relying on a bad actor not being able to send it. Am I missing something here?

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I’d want a hw kill switch for the modem/receivers so that I can take it with me to protests.

            • Macchi_the_Slime@piefed.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              That is a point, could someone even do that on something classed as a phone though? Don’t most places have some kind of law about these devices always being able to reach emergency services like 911?

              • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                It’s mandated that the service be available without charge (no SIM needed), but I don’t think there’s any regulations on the user disabling cell access themselves.