seasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoInsurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policypetapixel.comexternal-linkmessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up1268arrow-down14cross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1264arrow-down1external-linkInsurance Company Flew a Drone to Take Photos of Man's House and Canceled His Policypetapixel.comseasonone@opidea.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square80fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squareMrMonkey@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down7·1 year agoThe same reason flying airplanes isn’t “criminal trespassing”. Satellite and aerial photography happen really high up. No insurance company used a small toy drone to fly 50’ over his property for pictures.
minus-squareBettyWhiteInHD@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareMrMonkey@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoPeople downvote things they don’t want to be true. It’s strange. It doesn’t work that way.
minus-squareMatt Shatt@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agoNot even if we downvote extra hard?
The same reason flying airplanes isn’t “criminal trespassing”. Satellite and aerial photography happen really high up.
No insurance company used a small toy drone to fly 50’ over his property for pictures.
deleted by creator
People downvote things they don’t want to be true.
It’s strange. It doesn’t work that way.
Not even if we downvote extra hard?