seaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agoADUHD rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up11.02Karrow-down10
arrow-up11.02Karrow-down1imageADUHD rulelemmy.worldseaQueue@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 year agomessage-square59fedilink
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoTypically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
minus-squareDa Bald Eagul@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDoesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
minus-squareSamboT@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice. But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.
Typically one chooses/compromises between high resolution and high frame rate. 4k60 is one way to go.
Doesn’t mean 60hz is suddenly “trash”, as the commenter said.
Nope I would say whatever you are drawn to is the best choice.
But some people play fast paced games that benefit from higher frame rate and it is noticeable when you see a 60hz monitor afterwards.