Stats Don’t Back Up Republicans’ Crime-Wave Rhetoric - eviltoast

All in all, GOP fearmongering about crime parallels the party’s inflation alarms based on selective and outdated numbers. It can be effective, unfortunately; during 2022, Gallup found that 78 percent of Americans thought crime was higher nationally than in 2021. Turns out that just wasn’t the case.

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s crazy how effective fear mongering is. My mom is not a conservative woman by any means. She hates Trump and his kind with a passion. But she was still captivated by the migrant caravan. It took me several weeks to get her to recognize that it was purely a story running up to the election to play on people’s fears and get their votes.

    • JDPoZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because there is no “truth” in a media landscape where there is no penalty for lying.

      There is only propaganda.

  • Gargleblaster@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Know too that any time they bleat about the border, immigrants wouldn’t come if there weren’t rich white dudes offering them shit pay for grueling work.

    Anyone serious about the border would go after the employers. The Republicans only care about the border as a racist dog whistle.

  • Jerkules_Jerkules@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can remember when crime actually was out of control in the US. In the 80s and 90s violent crime was far, far, worse than today. It was during a time where republicans had been at the head of federal government for most of 20 years, and the majority of roughly 40. to top it off, while the exact reason the decline happened is still debated on some points, most agree a series of progressive legislation passed in the 70s are amongst the primary factors that drove the decline in criminal activity.

    Seriously, look for pictures of poor areas of major cities all over the US during that time, and the same for now. It is a night and day difference. We used to have large areas of major cities that looked like they had been bombed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtI-En92Xso

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s been these fucking YouTube ads I’ve seen 3 times now with an AI DjT voice telling you to go buy a gas mask because his whitehouse sources say there’s gonna be an event in 3 weeks. I keep reporting it as terrorist fear mongering but it really pisses me off. These people are the fucking worst.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    NATIONAL trends, yes. FTA:

    “The FBI’s crime statistics estimates for 2022 show that national violent crime decreased an estimated 1.7% in 2022 compared to 2021 estimates”

    But when you look at local numbers, such as shootings in my home town of Portland:
    https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/portlandpolicebureau/viz/PortlandShootingIncidentStatistics/ShootingIncidentStatistics

    January to August shooting numbers:
    2019 - 276
    2020 - 497
    2021 - 850
    2022 - 898
    2023 - 725

    If you look at full year numbers:

    2019 - 413
    2020 - 919
    2021 - 1315
    2022 - 1309
    2023 - 725 (through August)

    And that’s not violent crime in general, that’s JUST shootings.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      National trends down, but yes, every place is different with different reasons behind the decline. Unfortunately it’s quite difficult (albeit not always impossible) to find the covariates responsible for these trends.

      You can point to some policy changes, public sentiment, how police are run those years, economic changes due to COVID-19, and so on, but usually it’s going to be qualitative evidence at best. There just isn’t the multiverse version of Portland where X, Y or Z was slightly different, providing an experimental conditions to test policy and natural experiments only go so far (i.e. Portland compared to other midsized, liberal cities, is still going to ignore a ton of factors).

      What makes Portland special after the pandemic? My first instinct is always check what jobs were impacted, but as an outsider, I don’t know what Portland has aside from really good coffee and higher than average propensity for handlebar mustaches.