I used to be concerned about a game being too short. Now I worry that it will be too long. - eviltoast

Title mostly describes how I’m feeling now.

When I was younger, my main worry when deciding what game to buy and play next was that the game wouldn’t be able to keep me entertained until I can buy another game.

Now I have a backlog of almost 100 games that I own and haven’t played yet (although some come from bundles, not all are worth playing). My new concern when I’m playing a game is whether or not the time I put into the game is well spent.

I used to really like the idea of games where it would take me 100s of hours to get to 100% completion, but now I tend to almost avoid playing them entirely even if I know I don’t care about completion anymore.

I don’t think I’m alone in this, but what I’m really wondering is if this is a result of getting older? Or is it because the gaming space itself has changed?

  • limeaide@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope for a world where fun and optimization are prioritized over length and graphics

    Tbh I think that in the world, games would be cheaper and micro-transactions would be seen in a better light. I think people don’t mind supporting a developer who makes an actually good title

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even when it’s a small developer, I’d still rather buy the whole game/expansion at once. It’s easier to find reviews that way, and less immersion-breaking. I don’t want to be reminded of real world-money while playing.

      • limeaide@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah same. I was thinking about Vampire survivors so I think we’re on the same page. I should have said DLCs instead of micro transactions