lemmy.ml - eviltoast
  • LordGimp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no argument for “both sides bad” when one side is currently right now this instant blowing up hospitals, schools, and children. One side is objectively worse and it’s the side hiding behind the skirts of “antisemitism” as they carry out an Arabic genocide

    • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree.

      Both sides are bad, no matter who is currently the aggressor.

      Now because there is aggression, the aggressor has an obligation to stop it, and we have an obligation to force a stop in the conflict as well. But that doesn’t make the other party less Bad in this. Both sides killed a lot of innocent people, both have inhumane ulterior motives and both are supporting further escalation. But ofc if there’s only one party doing the fighting, then that’s the party that acutely needs to be stopped.

      This distinction is very important to me, because you are not suddenly the good guy because you stopped killing civilians. You are just not actively doing war crimes which means we don’t have to intervene because of you anymore, which is at least one less reason. But you are not holy because “this year it was only 300 war crimes”.

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Both have inhuman ulterior motives”

        Palestine wants to be free

        Israel wants to genocide Palestine and live in their homes

        Yes I can see how wanting liberty and self governance is exactly the same as wanting more land for your historically landless people regardless of how many natives you have to kill. Completely balanced

        • Bigmouse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          The attacks weren’t perpetrated by a free Palestinian people or some recognized advocacy group, but by an extremist wing of the Muslim Brotherhood that has been pushed by Israel for decades.

            • Bigmouse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s a bit more complicated than that. Palestine doesn’t have a strong democratic tradition to begin with. Additionally, Hamas is only governing Gaza, not the West Banks. Hamas also suppresses secular Freedom organizations. And ~50% of the people in Gaza wouldnt even be able to vote out Hamas since they are under 18. Then we have the case of Hamas indoctrination, which finds fertile soil in the impoverished and destitute Gaza youth.

              All of that isn’t to say I support Hamas. I am quite vocal in my disdain for them. But Israel plays a significant part in their success. So does Iran. And let’s not forget that the religious right has been torpedoing a resolution aswell, not just the Jihadist organization Hamas. Rabin wasn’t killed by a palestinian hardliner.

            • zaph@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              When did the Palestinians vote last? What were the demographics of that vote? Are you completely confident it was a purely democratic vote or was it the kind of democracy Putin got voted by? Perhaps the kind kim was voted in by? Or do you think Palestinians have an electoral college like the US?

          • LordGimp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lmfao that hasn’t been true since Athens invented democracy. Alcibiades was elected plenty and still turned traitor. The average Palestinian doesn’t support Hamas, but they’re not going to denounce one of the few factions actually fighting towards their goals. Get Israel out of Palestine and you’ll be amazed how few rockets will fly

              • LordGimp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                As a native American in modern America, tell me more about how the terrorists won. Lmao my people also fought back, were labeled “terrorists” (read “savages” for old timey historically accurate racism flavor), and were damn near driven to extinction. There’s a reason I’m French Indian instead of just Indian.

      • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So forcing an entire people’s into ghettos and taking their land, while putting them under blockade and only reluctantly letting I’m small amounts of aid and food, all while bombing them weekly is actually good, because sometimes they fight back, making them the aggressor?

        • rwtwm@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The post you replied to called no actor in this good. That’s your own forced dichotomy. To condemn an act does not mean you condone every act taken in response.

      • dumdum666@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        But ofc if there’s only one party doing the fighting, then that’s the party that acutely needs to be stopped.

        Hamas never stopped fighting and they still have about 200 hostages. What makes you think that the IDF would stop fighting now?