Who here uses a less popular Linux distribution? What made you choose it? - eviltoast

Hey fellow Linux enthusiasts! I’m curious to know if any of you use a less popular, obscure or exotic Linux distribution. What motivated you to choose that distribution over the more mainstream ones? I’d love to hear about your experiences and any unique features or benefits that drew you to your chosen distribution.

  • nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It all began with Nix software build system and package manager; they needee a way to build, compile software in a reproducible way. That is, if it builds on my machine, it should build on yours too given some constraints. Then they build a whole package repository for such sofware or package definitions, Nixpkgs, that can be build or retrieved using Nix package manager. Nixpkgs grew to be a repository for enabling runnig an GNU Linux OS on it: NixOS. It is declarative in the sense you write what it should contain like packages and behaves like system services. For example, see https://git.sr.ht/~misterio/nix-config.

    Atomic in the sense that when you want to change system’s configuration or state, everything should suceed in that update, otherwise fails; it is everything or nothing. This enables storing previous and current system revisions, so can rollback to previous state.

    Nix plus things like flakes, nix shell, enables a build inviroment akin to containers, but much better, correct, and flexible.

    Haskell is just an ecossytem Nixpkgs support.

      • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        NixOS is a general purpose distro (I use it on my router, server and laptop, and plan to install it on my phone, it doesn’t get any more general purpose). To run packages that aren’t in its repo, you write a package yourself. Note that unlike on traditional Linux systems, there’s essentially no concept of “installing” packages. Packages are built and put into /nix/store, then you can optionally add them to your system packages or user packages and they will be symlinked to /run/current-system/sw or ~/.nix-profile, but there’s nothing preventing you from just using the package without adding it to system/user packages.

      • nyl@lemmy.opensupply.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Basically all that. The unfinished part IMO is mostly for use in developer use cases, and that some ecosystems like JVM are not as well supported.

        Can run yes, given that you have to spend some time learning Nix and NixOS specifics. I do that myself.

        You either package the software if it is easy to do so—take a look a at nix-init which eases the process—or use Flatpack, containers, steam-run…

    • silverwind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      May I ask what does .nix files do? I have joined unixporn community,and when I look into the dotfiles of some nix os user,their config are all written in nix rather than .conf or some other prevalent files. Should I learn nix if I want to use nix os? Or can I config my apps such as waybar in a way just like other systems (such as arch)?

      • paholg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You should have some understanding of the nix language to use it, but I wouldn’t worry too too much.

        I would also start by installing nix and home-manager on top of whatever distro you already use. For some config, you need to specify things in nix, but for things in home-manager, for example, you can usually either use nix or point to a toml or conf or whatever file.