Netflix Pricing Shakeup Removes Cheapest Ad-Free Plan In U.K. and U.S. - eviltoast

Netflix Pricing Shakeup Removes Cheapest Ad-Free Plan In U.K. and U.S.::Online streaming giant Netflix has quietly removed its ad-free Basic plan, forcing users to pay more or sit through adverts to keep costs down.

  • Cave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If anyone wants a suggestion for one Mullvad is fantastic. They somewhat recently withstood a real life test of being raided and proved they keep no logs. There is no bulk pricing but the service is top tier.

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re no longer good for torrenting as they removed port forwarding at the beginning of the month.

      • PeachMan@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Port forwarding isn’t necessary for torrents…

        However, I would agree that they’re not the best for torrenting, Mullvad is for truly paranoid people that are REALLY concerned about privacy. If you just want to torrent without getting letters from your ISP, cheaper options like Nord, Proton, and PIA are fine.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s necessary if you want to seed anything or join a private tracker. Torrenting without port forwarding just leads to a bunch of dead torrents and the inability to share/download that content in the future.

          • PeachMan@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Eh? What does port forwarding have to do with dead torrents? I was under the impression that trackers tracked your IP to see if you were seeding, and that doesn’t require port forwarding. Also, I’d argue that your private tracker isn’t private enough if you need a VPN to use it. I use one private tracker without a VPN to avoid all those issues, and the rest of my torrenting is on public trackers with a VPN. Seems to have worked so far.

            • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              If you don’t have port forwarding, most other users can’t make a connection to your computer. How that ends up leading to dead torrents is that you’re reducing the size of the swarm by not seeding. Additionally, it may still show you as a seeder which can cause issues if you’re the only user as nobody will be able to actually make a connection with you to download the file.

              As far as private trackers go, I have no reason to ‘trust’ any of them since I don’t personally know any of the people running them. You can choose to turn your VPN off with them even though you already have one running for public sites, but I don’t see how that benefits you in any way. It’s just a needless risk.

                • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Maybe keep reading.

                  Bittorrent relies on your connection working both ways: to accept incoming and outgoing connections. Without port-forwarding: you may will see slower speeds, slower speed ramp up and if a torrent has very few online seeders you may run into a situation where you cannot connect to anybody at all - no download! Seeding is very hard without port-forwarding.

                  Normally home users cannot accept incoming connections due to NAT. This is always the case for proxies and VPNs, but some VPNs allow the assignment of a port that will always lead to your connected device (and to your client). Making outgoing connections is always technically possible but then you rely on the seed/peer to have their ports open! At least one side must be open. There’s no way around.

                  They even had a special FAQ-like section for users such as yourself right before the above quote.

                  But it has been running fine without any port-forwarding for me!

                  Can you explain the risk of port forwarding through a VPN?

                  • PeachMan@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Port forwarding is inherently unsafe because it opens your network to outside connections from anyone that knows which port to ping. Having a VPN does nothing to mitigate that threat, it just gives you a different IP.