REdOG@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?www.jeffgeerling.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down10cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mllinux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.devoperating_systems@beehaw.orgsysadmin@reddthat.comtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up18arrow-down1external-linkDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?www.jeffgeerling.comREdOG@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.mllinux_lugcast@lemux.minnix.devoperating_systems@beehaw.orgsysadmin@reddthat.comtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squarearthurpizza@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoThis is not a violation of the GPL. They are allowed to charge for access to the source. If you provide binaries/images to a customer, you also must provide source. However, anyone who doesn’t pay isn’t entitled to it. However, this is still a total bonehead move.
This is not a violation of the GPL. They are allowed to charge for access to the source. If you provide binaries/images to a customer, you also must provide source. However, anyone who doesn’t pay isn’t entitled to it.
However, this is still a total bonehead move.