Why old games never die (but new ones do) - eviltoast
  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Is it Sturgeon’s Law?

    We remember the best 10% of old games but compare them to 100% of new games, including the 90% that are crap.

    • MoogleMaestro@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      We remember the best 10% of old games but compare them to 100% of new games, including the 90% that are crap.

      While I think there’s truth to this, with regards to single player games, I think multiplayer games have had a notable shift toward “service” that gives players less agency to keep games alive.

      There are dozens of old PC games with moderately active gaming communities, like CS1.6 and the like. Newer games tend to get “shutdown” and the services are no longer available. Users have to have enough passion for these games to be willing to completely reverse engineer the server backend,

      I think the point of this article is to share that games without proper modding support or indefinite “always online” connection checks tend to die, whereas old games that don’t have these features have the opportunity to live “forever” (or as long as there are still people willing to play.)

  • JiveTurkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    We can emulate the systems required for old games and almost any hardware can run them. That isn’t the case for modern games. I think that’s a big part of it.