YSK about corporations' strategies to kill open source protocols - eviltoast

Why YSK: If we want to keep the Fediverse in the hands of its users and prevent “enshittification” (search it), it’s good to know how corporations kill grassroots projects like this.

I saw this in another thread on /c/Showerthoughts. I think it’s important for this to be circulated widely so that the broader Fediverse community is aligned. We don’t want admins second-guessing their decisions when users start infighting. We should be united in our thinking and ready to protect our platform.

  • sadreality@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see how anyone can be pro corporate at this point on the time line short of being a major shareholder or executive. As worker, consumer, and taxpayer, I am so fucking tired of their corruption and crimes. Nothing left to do but vote with your feet and money, since political process is captured. Maybe third-party vote as no confidence vote in the regime.

    • Zardoz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think most people in theory are against big corporations, but when it comes down to it they just go ‘it is what it is’ and just accept the big corps without any attempts to break off that path.

      My wife is like that and I think it has more to do with not being very tech savvy/or willingness to try something different.

      • wildncrazyguy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Corporations are great for one thing, and that’s becoming a funnel for money. They bring people people together to optimize for work on that goal. Innovation just happens to be a consequence of that constant pursuit. I think they do have a place in the societal fabric.

        However, we need the other pillars of society to be strong as well in order to maintain balance and democracy - strong government, strong workers’ unions, cultural cohesion , advocacy for nature and resources.

        You weaken those, you may get some tidy profits short term, but likely at the expense of our future.

        • TheBeege@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right. Capitalism isn’t inherently bad. It encourages resources being put into new ideas and technologies, but if left unfettered, it can abuse the people operating within it, as we see now. This is similar to communism being highly vulnerable to low productivity and stagnation. It’s not a direct objective of the system, but it’s a natural consequence without some kind of outside force regulating it.

          To be clear, I’m agreeing, but I’m adding focus to the balance aspect of things