China dev fined 3 yrs’ salary for VPN use - eviltoast
  • Affidavit@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did you even read the comment chain you’re responding to? You know, the one where I said it is ‘good to show genuine scepticism’? Or the one after that, where I linked the ‘unnamed’ individual’s alleged GitHub?

    I am not the one being overly trusting here. I think it is ‘likely’ that this story is true. I researched it, looked at the significant amount of evidence, and I am still not 100% convinced. That is far more than what I can say for you people replying to me en masse who all assume the story must be an American plot with absolutely no evidence to back up this claim.

    Ugh, I need to figure out a way to unsubscribe from replies to a post. You people are bonkers.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Woah you read some anonymous person’s social media page and went to a GitHub page that may or may not be connected to the same person?

      Fuck, call the Pulitzer committee, we got ourselves an investigative journalist.

      • Affidavit@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please keep responding to my comments everyone. I’ve decided to take this as an opportunity to block as many of you annoying mosquitoes as possible so I don’t have to deal with you in the future.

    • nighty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      So let’s get this straight, the unnamed individual has a name. The dude who got busted for overseas contract work using a VPN is still committing his work on GitHub… which requires a VPN. Either we’re not getting the full story, or we’re just being lied to for internet clout.

      If you’re not 100% convinced, why are you trying to defend this article as if it were fact?