YICHM@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-25 months agoUsing 24-hour format and 12-hour format together is worse than using either of those alone.message-squaremessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up175arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up162arrow-down1message-squareUsing 24-hour format and 12-hour format together is worse than using either of those alone.YICHM@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · edit-25 months agomessage-square22linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKSP Atlas@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 months agoClearly the solution is to adopt decimal time and have 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute
minus-squareVirusMaster3073@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoThe French actually tried this
minus-squareDerpgon@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoProbably failed because you have to do math for numbers above 20.
minus-squareYICHM@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoNow I’m wondering whether corporations would use 6-hour shifts (2.5 dec) instead of 8-hour shifts (3.33… dec) when switching to decimal time.
Clearly the solution is to adopt decimal time and have 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute
The French actually tried this
Probably failed because you have to do math for numbers above 20.
deleted by creator
Now I’m wondering whether corporations would use 6-hour shifts (2.5 dec) instead of 8-hour shifts (3.33… dec) when switching to decimal time.