Utah becomes the first state to ban fluoride in public drinking water - eviltoast

Summary

Utah became the first state to ban fluoride in public drinking water after Republican Gov. Spencer Cox signed legislation prohibiting local decisions on fluoridation.

Cox cited cost and personal choice, likening fluoride to government “medication.”

The ban faces opposition from dentists and health experts, who argue fluoride prevents cavities and benefits low-income communities.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans receive fluoridated water. Some cities have already removed fluoride, and a recent court order requires the EPA to regulate high levels that may affect children’s intellectual development.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    This would 100% be easily enough to make me move away.

    That’s a massive negative impact on my child’s health. Anyone with more than 1 braincell who lives in Utah right now and wants to raise kids should be considering leaving to live somewhere with fluoride, unless you want your kid to be at risk of a bunch of health issues.

    2025: we are bringing fucking Rickets back baby!

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Just take the iodine out of salt while we’re at it. Don’t need no smart thunkers in the Amazon warehouse.

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      This would 100% be easily enough to make me move away.

      A bit of an overreaction there. Fluoride may provide some benefit for those who don’t even brush their teeth, but as long as you can manage at least that much self-care then it doesn’t actually do much of anything if at all.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      8 days ago

      Technically there is very little evidence of the benefits of flouridated water, aside from reducing tooth decay, but there are absolutely zero risks too.

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Technically there is very little evidence of the benefits of flouridated water, aside from reducing tooth decay

        Reducing tooth decay is such a massive benefit to the population that at first I thought you were making as sarcastic joke here. I think you underestimate what a big deal that actually is.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          What an original reply I’m so glad you’re not repeating the same things everybody else is saying.

      • SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        8 days ago

        Helping prevent tooth decay is the whole point of fluoridated water isn’t it? I also believe dental health has been linked to other health issues like increased risk of heart disease and stroke.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          30
          ·
          8 days ago

          It doesn’t prevent tooth decay, you still have to take good care of your teeth with it, but it reduces tooth decay. Reduces. Important distinction.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              21
              ·
              8 days ago

              I’m saying if this becomes more of a partisan political issue then I will refuse to argue with the dipshits.

              There are much more important issues at hand.

      • Habahnow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I don’t know if this is sarcastic or not. We’re in the type of world where would be sarcastic statements could be serious.

        This feels like someone saying, “there’s little evidence of vaccines having benefits, aside from preventing disease and death, but there’s absolutely little risk too”

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          Vaccines actually prevent sickness and death in the vast majority. Like 95% reduction in cases.

          Flouridated water has been shown by World Oral Health Report 2003 to reduce the rate at which dental caries (tooth decay) require intervention by 15% and UK NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination found 14.6%, however other studies have explored the idea that this rate of decline could be correlated with flouridated water and was not caused by it.

          Again I think we should keep flouridating water but its not the end of the world if we don’t.

          • Bone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            Not the flu vaccine. It’s nowhere near 95% effective. But that’s not the point. You still take it especially if you are vulnerable.