While I don’t disagree with the overall message of the article (I agree that there are a lot of reasons that AI is bad), the article itself is of poor quality (in my humble opinion), which might save someone else from wasting the 30 seconds it will take to read it. As another commentor pointed out, it seems likely that this article — arguing that AI is bad — was indeed, somewhat paradoxically, itself written by AI.
In an attempt to be helpful, I will, however, share a link to the article, which will allow others to avoid the paywall, and thus form their own opinion on the matter, seeing as the original link does not allow anyone to actually read the article in question, due to said paywall.
I’m sorry that my comment annoyed you enough to warrant the scathing review and analysis; I do, however, feel that it might be based on a somewhat flawed interpretation of what I actually wrote, possibly due to an underdeveloped prefrontal cortex (conceivably age related), or poor education, or both, combined with low impulse control (conceivably age- and/or diagnosis related).
Either way, I hope you have a great day, and good luck with life.
Sorry, I’ll try it with crayons:
I’m sorry that my comment annoyed you enough to warrant the scathing review and analysis; I do, however, feel that it might be based on a somewhat flawed interpretation of what I actually wrote, possibly due to an underdeveloped prefrontal cortex (conceivably age related), or poor education, or both, combined with low impulse control (conceivably age- and/or diagnosis related).
Either way, I hope you have a great day, and good luck with life.
I love the smell of ban-worthy levels of condescension in the morning.
this poster is way too smart for us