how is it that libs constantly lack any understanding of historical context - eviltoast

No mention of why Romania was in such a bad state. Turns out it was the same playbook as today with the Global South. Romania gets IMF loans mid 70s. And just like John Perkins discusses in his book ‘confessions of an Economic Hitman’, the IMF made the terms of the loan contingent on austerity. Then due to global macroeconomic conditions and interest rate hikes, Romania can’t repay the debts and starts to implode. This of course by design as per IMF/World bank strategy.

The people rise up against AUSTERITY but libs scream about ‘communist dictatorship’.

Zero historical context. Just ‘Communism bad, mmmkay?’. Like the Ukraine proxy war, nothing happened before Russia invaded. No it was ‘totally unprovoked’.

Here’s the background of this lemmy.world propaganda:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania_and_the_International_Monetary_Fund

  • knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I bring up context like this the person I’m in conversation with often rolls their eyes and says something like “it doesn’t matter why things were bad under communism, people had a traumatic time and you have to respect that.”

    Anyway has anyone got more sources on Romania and the Imperialist Monetary Fund profiteering?

    • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s their way of saying, “I don’t give a shit as long as it confirms my anti-communist bias. Say the same thing about a capitalist country and I’ll demand sources for every point you’ve made”