Brian Eno: “The biggest problem about AI is not intrinsic to AI. It’s to do with the fact that it’s owned by the same few people” - eviltoast
  • Polderviking@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That it’s controlled by a few is only a problem if you use it… my issue with it starts before that.

    My biggest gripe with AI is the same problem I have with anything crypto: It’s out of control power consumption relative to the problem it solves or purpose it serves. And by extension the fact nobody with any kind of real political power is addressing this.

    Here we are using recycled bags, banning straws, putting explosive refrigerant in fridges and using led lights in everything, all in the name of the environment, while at the same time in some datacenter they are burning kwh’s by the bucket loads generating pictures of cats in space suits.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here we are using recycled bags, banning straws, putting explosive refrigerant in fridges and using led lights in everything, all in the name of the environment, while at the same time in some datacenter they are burning kwh’s by the bucket loads generating pictures of cats in space suits.

      That’s, #1, fashion and not about environment, #2, fashion promoted because it’s cheaper for the industry.

      And yes, power saved somewhere will just be spent elsewhere. Cheaper. Cause that means reduced demand for power (or grown not as fast as otherwise).

    • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here we are using recycled bags, banning straws, putting explosive refrigerant in fridges and using led lights in everything

      lol, sucker. none of that does shit and industry was already destroying the planet just fine before ai came along.

        • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          yes. we are cancer. i live on as little as possible but i don’t delude myself into thinking my actions have any effect on the whole.

          i spent nearly 20 years not using paper towels until i realized how pointless it was. now i throw my trash out the window. we’re all fucked. if we want to change things, there’s only one tool that will fix it. until people realize that, i really don’t fucking care any more.

          • Polderviking@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            now i throw my trash out the window.

            You don’t believe not using paper towels was a net positive so now you choose to create and by extention live in a pigsty? I’m not following.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      My biggest gripe with AI is the same problem I have with anything crypto crypto: It’s out of control power consumption relative to the problem it solves or purpose it serves.

      Don’t thrown all crypto under the bus. Only bitcoin and other proof of work protocols are power hungry. 2nd and 3rd generation crypto use mostly proof of stake and ZKrollups for security. Much more energy efficient.

      • Polderviking@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m aware of this, but it still mostly just something for people speculate on. Something people buy, sit on, and then hopefully sell with a profit.

        Bitcoin was supposed to be a decentralized money alternative, but the amount of people actually, legitimately, buying things with crypto are highly negligible. And honestly even if it did serve it’s actual purpose, the cumulative power consumption would still be a point of debate.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes, most people buy, sit on, and then hopefully sell with a profit.

          However, there are a large number of devs building useful things (supply chain, money transfer, digital identity). Most as good as, but not yet better than incumbent solutions.

          My main challenge is the energy misconception. The cumulative power of the ethereum network runs on the energy equivalent of a single wind turbine.

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          And honestly even if it did serve it’s actual purpose, the cumulative power consumption would still be a point of debate.

          Yeah, but at that point you’d have to consider it against how much power the traditional banking system uses.