Dunning-Kruger - eviltoast
  • iltg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    “what is the third gender” your deliberate misunderstanding and simplification of the issue is just bad faith debate. you’re proving us that fractions are “syndromes” by using only integers. this is just a display of ignorance and bigotry, it doesn’t really paint you as smart as you’re trying to appear

      • iltg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        so we agree that

        1: one 2: two

        and then there are just some numbers in between, 0.1, 0.2…

        this is just a fact, you coming in these comments wielding words you don’t understand and concepts you barely grasps doesn’t make you smart or correct

        you’re just a bigot regardless

          • iltg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            gender is nothing more than “today i feel”

            congrats on your strawman, you’re really driving your point home

            numbers can be proven mathematically

            congrats on proving math with math

            there is scientific proof that gender ideology is not “today i feel”, that sex and gender are distinct. you brought up multiple chromosomal conditions which are part of the scientific proof of such claim, but are too sold on high school biology to entertain complex concepts

            if you want to bring “science” in this discussion, maybe read it first? it’s ok to be uninformed, you can be wrong on the internet