Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agoStarbucks continues to be terriblelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down15cross-posted to: WorkReform@europe.pubantiwork@europe.pub
arrow-up11.22Karrow-down1imageStarbucks continues to be terriblelemmy.dbzer0.comSir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Work Reform@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square129fedilinkcross-posted to: WorkReform@europe.pubantiwork@europe.pub
minus-squareLaurel Raven@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·20 days agoThey could have paid every one of those employees nearly 6 figures instead. If the company is doing so badly that they feel they need to lay off a thousand people, they should not be handing out CEO bonuses, period.
minus-squareDogEarBookmark@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·20 days agoPretty sure a good portion of that was union busting, but that’s what we’re all about now.
minus-squareLaurel Raven@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·20 days agoThis would not shock me in the slightest
They could have paid every one of those employees nearly 6 figures instead. If the company is doing so badly that they feel they need to lay off a thousand people, they should not be handing out CEO bonuses, period.
Pretty sure a good portion of that was union busting, but that’s what we’re all about now.
This would not shock me in the slightest