[Discussion] Should we defederate exploding-heads.com? (Closing arguments) - eviltoast

Exploding-heads.com is another instance on Lemmy where alt-right MAGA types tend to reside. Some people on this server want us to defederate from them immediately, some people want to save defederation as a last resort. They have 104 active users (more stats below).

It seems that exploding-heads has also experienced a recent botswarm invasion. This is obviously another point in favor of defederating them, assuming you are worried about botswarms, which is currently being discussed here.

My advice to you all is please try to discuss this in a civil manner, we need not allow them to create divisive conflict inside our communities. No matter how the vote turns out, you’re not going to be able to defederate from your fellow sh.itheads so be nice.

I’ve linked many of the previous discussions below so people who are out of the loop can get a general sense of the situation.

https://sh.itjust.works/post/216888 https://sh.itjust.works/post/225714 https://sh.itjust.works/post/281126 https://sh.itjust.works/post/410325

Lemmy.world just recently defederated them.

https://lemmy.world/post/747912

https://lemmy.world/post/577526

Although this could be considered a point in favor of defederation, it actually means even if we vote to remain federated, people have a great alternative in lemmy.world where they can still participate in our communities and simultaneously be protected from exploding-heads.

Ensuring diversity of servers is beneficial to the platform as a whole, but it is also not our responsibility to bear that burden.

TLDR, just wrap up any last points in this thread before we open the vote tomorrow. Please be civil.

EDIT: To clarify, this isn’t the official vote, this is the final discussion. The vote thread will be posted tomorrow and you will only be allowed to make a single comment saying Aye or Nay.

EDIT2: Vote thread is up, this thread is now locked. Very lively discussion thread sh.itheads. Please try to be more respectful next time.

  • imaqtpie@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Our plan is to create a set of behavioral guidelines that the community agrees upon and use that to automatically filter out the absolute filth, without bothering the community.

    I think it’s just part of the growing pains of Lemmy. Let’s be honest, almost everyone who was here before the reddit exodus is an extremist of some sort. Whether it’s tankies, MAGA, lolis, etc, we are going to have to put in the work to clean up this platform. It is what it is, where the fuck else can we go at this point?

    The reason we can’t just ignore it is because some of our users are bothered by these idiots. And some of those users are good contributors so we want to give them a chance to air their concerns and respect the democratic process.

    As I’ve said before and will probably say many more times, just be happy you don’t have to mod. You can just go browse and forget about whatever goes on here, we are not going to do anything crazy, we can barely decide on anything 😅

    • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason we can’t just ignore it is because some of our users are bothered by these idiots. And some of those users are good contributors

      Both cannot be true. There is no such thing as a good contributor who seeks to censor others because they personally don’t like seeing things that challenge their views

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who is being censored? They don’t have a right to be federated with us. No one is saying they have to shut their instance down.

        • MomoTimeToDie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Blocking content is censorship, even if it’s within someone’s right to do so. The right to do something is not the entitlement to support in doing so.