Trump privately fuming after King Charles makes other leaders feel ā€˜specialā€™ too - eviltoast

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26592059

Summary

Donald Trump is upset after King Charles warmly welcomed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Sandringham, making Trumpā€™s own state visit invitation seem ā€œless special.ā€

Trumpā€™s allies allegedly asked the British government to intervene, but officials stated the king makes his own decisions.

Relations may also be strained by Trumpā€™s criticism of Canada, where Charles remains head of state.

The U.K. government denied tensions, reaffirming strong U.S.-U.K. ties.

  • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    9 hours ago

    Popular by total votes tallied, not popular by total eligible voters. Only about 50-70% of all eligible voters vote - call it 2/3. Campaigning is less about swinging voters between parties and more about convincing them to show up for the ballot. This is Trumpā€™s specialty. He is so inflammatory that he has driven more people to the polls, both for and against him. But if you look at the actual stats, 2016 was won with just 27% of the eligible voter populationā€™s vote and 2024 with 32%. The runner up tallied 29% and 31%, respectively. 3rd party votes donā€™t exceed 2% which means both the winner and the 2nd place candidates collected a total vote count about equal to the number of people who didnā€™t show up at all.

    More towards what people actually see in him, they think heā€™s their friend. His vitriol makes them beleive heā€™s really just in this for an altruistic motive about returning the USA to a place of freedom (for the white Christian patriarchal population). They donā€™t think he is in it for financial gain. They think theyā€™re poor because democrats gave money to brown people. They think being a dick to other countries will bring the USA back to a self-sustaining country. They beleive corporations will do the right thing in response and choose to no longer exploit poor countries. They think the decline of US citizensā€™ private wealth is from welfare policies, not from corporate greed. They donā€™t recognize that the USAā€™s 1950s-60s economic boom was rooted in being the only major industrial nation that was NOT bombed to kingdom come in the 40s.

    And above all, I beleive conservatives generally lack empathy. They beleive this dichotomy that everyone has equal opportunity but also that behavior is racial. They canā€™t bring themselves to beleive minorities have it rougher due to systemic issues. They canā€™t understand how poverty, teen pregnancy, drug abuse, lacking Healthcare, inability to afford higher education, or predisposition to violence is more easily predicted by birth location than anything else. Until it happens to one of their own, one who looks like them, looks like a daughter, looks like a brother. This frees them to vote for Trump and beleive in a year, theyā€™ll be wealthy, screaming ā€œfuck you, got mineā€ to the lesser demographics that just wonā€™t play nice. That gives way to the most upsetting irony. Theyā€™re voting for a ā€œbusinessmanā€ who will ā€œrun the country like a businessā€ yet somehow cannot understand, at all, Trump is a grifter that is excellent at branding himself as successful on the backs of bankrupted companies that gave him golden parachutes. Why would anyone want trump to run the country like a Trump business? Bankruptcies, layoffs, shutdowns, downsizes, and a fat check for Trump? Because itā€™s about race, religion, and societal norms. Itā€™s believing that being white, Christian, and patriarchal should automatically come with success in America. All of the hypocrisy and side effects is just the cost of gaining personal wealth.

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      4 hours ago

      I agree with all of your points.
      You also seem to write grammatically correct sentences bereft of the typical misspellings that confound ESL writersā€¦ which makes me wonder: how did you manage to get ā€œbelieveā€ wrong FIVE times, and then nail it when it became ā€œbelievingā€ at the end?

      • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        2 hours ago

        Because i/e has dumb, inconsistent rules and Iā€™ve apparently Iā€™ve written it wrong enough times that my autocorrect has taken it to be the correct, learned spelling. At least itā€™s better than when it takes charge of the sentence and completely flips nā€™t contractions. Those are sneaky and incredibly confusing if not caught.

        But I keep shopping for ceiling materials and I can recognize cieling is wrong, so thatā€™s nice.