cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agoLike programming in bashlemmy.mlimagemessage-square178fedilinkarrow-up11.47Karrow-down115cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.45Karrow-down1imageLike programming in bashlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 day agomessage-square178fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarezarathustra0@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·15 hours agoNo, Makefile syntax is more extreme.
minus-squareXanza@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 hours agoI swapped from Make to Just: https://github.com/casey/just Way better, IMO. Super simple logic, just as flexible.
minus-squarespicystraw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·13 hours agoSure, but bash is more relatable, I think
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours agoI find Makefile isn’t too bad, as long as I can stay away from automake and autoreconf.
No, Makefile syntax is more extreme.
I swapped from Make to Just: https://github.com/casey/just
Way better, IMO. Super simple logic, just as flexible.
Sure, but bash is more relatable, I think
I find
Makefileisn’t too bad, as long as I can stay away fromautomakeandautoreconf.