TIL In the Hot Coffee lawsuit against McDonalds,punitive damages were given due to McDonalds intentionally overheating coffee to save money on refills - eviltoast

During the trial it was revealed that McDonald’s knew that heating their coffee to this temperature would be dangerous, but they did it anyways because it would save them money. When you serve coffee that is too hot to drink, it will take much longer for a person to drink their coffee, which means that McDonald’s will not have to give out as many free refills of coffee. This policy by the fast food chain is the reason the jury awarded $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages in the McDonald’s hot coffee case. Punitive damages are meant to punish the defendant for their inappropriate business practice.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    but yet people will still dismiss it as a stupid lawsuit by some greedy woman. gotta protect those big corps

    People, or “people”?

    Redirecting the narrative away from your faults helps protect your profits.

    • Jennie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      both. the corporation for starting a smear campaign and the public for buying into it and not doing their own research