Meta claims torrenting pirated books isn’t illegal without proof of seeding - eviltoast
    • ulterno@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Well, that’s how it tends to be in most places.
      You don’t get caught for downloading; you get caught for uploading.

      Using a similar logic to distribution via DVDs. Only the seller gets into trouble. The buyer does not.


      Another point, opening a web page means downloading it, so if someone wanted to frame someone for downloading something, it would be very easy to make such a trap. This, accompanied with CSAM and network monitoring could be used to easily get any person using the internet, in jail, just for opening the wrong link. So, the laws require much more information regarding intent and such.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        The buyers/downloaders don’t get caught is just because there are too many of them and going after the distributor is an easy target.

        • gon [he]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not the case, necessarily.

          In Portugal, for example, it’s legal to download pirated content. It’s not a matter of not pursuing it because it’s hard or being difficult to catch or distributors are an easier target, it’s just that, legally, you’re not doing anything wrong.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          In Canada it’s legal to download and watch content for personal use, so it’s when it’s shared that it becomes an issue.

          Just like you could record anything with a vcr, you just couldn’t share it with your friends.

        • ulterno@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Is it not also because it was easier to feign ignorance for the time the laws were passed?
          And that nobody thought of Tor, while at the same time, leechers who don’t seed are actually being worse for the Torrent?

      • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Eh. Makes sense from the perspective of protecting profits, I guess, because the actual thing which bothers them is the volume of lost potential customers…

    • regrub@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      And the copyright owners have no problem with them profiting from derived works that were made using pirated content?