Whole Foods argues it can ban BLM masks because the Supreme Court let a Christian business owner refuse same-sex couples - eviltoast
Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings.

Amazon.com’s Whole Foods Market doesn’t want to be forced to let workers wear “Black Lives Matter” masks and is pointing to the recent US Supreme Court ruling permitting a business owner to refuse services to same-sex couples to get federal regulators to back off.

National Labor Relations Board prosecutors have accused the grocer of stifling worker rights by banning staff from wearing BLM masks or pins on the job. The company countered in a filing that its own rights are being violated if it’s forced to allow BLM slogans to be worn with Whole Foods uniforms.

Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings, saying the case “provides a clear roadmap” to throw out the NLRB’s complaint.

The dispute is one of several in which labor board officials are considering what counts as legally-protected, work-related communication and activism on the job.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
      95·
      1 year ago

      No… It’s asking people to adhere to the policies that existed when they were hired…

      no slogans, logos, or advertising except for Whole Foods branding

      You can literally search “whole foods dress code” and find reddit posts of people discussing this YEARS ago.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/wholefoods/comments/mdcifx/dress_code/

      This is nothing new… It’s a bog standard policy for many places.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
          64·
          1 year ago

          LMAO A tankie talking about “boot licking”. That’s hilarious. You worship someone who literally killed my people for no reason… And defend it like it was okay. Talk about boot licking.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comEnglish
          64·
          1 year ago

          Signage and displays isn’t a violation of dress code… So yes. This is different.

          I’m sure if they decided they could make money off of the BLM movement they’d put up signage and displays for it too. But they’re the one’s paying the bills… they get to make up the rules in their establishment.