What's the deal with Signal? - eviltoast

I don’t know if I’m opening a can of worms here, and I’m still trying to backtrack a lot of history where I was tuning everything out. I keep seeing random swipes at Signal (or the representatives (?)), and I was wondering whether they are founded or just lies.Is it another situation like Lemmy where we just “take the technology and move on”? Thanks!

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you ARE targeted by 5 eyes, you’d probably want to not be using your phone for communications, but Signal sorta requires you to, even if there’s a desktop client.

    However, I don’t presume to know what would be the best option. SimpleX maybe, as the servers don’t keep messages? Otherwise, I use Matrix because it’s a lot more common and very easy to set up your own homeserver. However, again, if I had to hide something from a 5 eyes threat actor, they’d just find some vulnerability in my server config or, hell, maybe they can somehow sneakily get root access through the VPS provider itself, as I’m not hosting on my own hardware.

    Honestly, meeting in person might be the most private solution if you’ve got that kind of a threat model.

    • irelephant 🍭@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Signal doesn’t keep messages on their servers either. The only data they have on you is your phone number and the unix time you made your account in.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        How do you know that?

        It’s what happens in the publicized source code, yes, but how do you know that’s what’s running in their servers? How do you know that all requests aren’t saved?

        Luckily Signal has e2ee and client side code is easy to verify, so they’d only have access to encrypted messages anyway, but if you’re talking state level actors of the highest caliber, they might be able to crack Signal’s encryption eventually.

        Look, I’ll agree that Signal is probably secure enough. It’s definitely secure enough for me, I only run Matrix as a hobby because I like decentralization, my Matrix server is probably less secure than Signal. But I’m just saying we can never know for sure what code is running in THEIR servers, therefore we can never trust is 100%.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            And I hope for sure that they’re never quietly forced to change that.

            But again, if there were 3 letter agencies and gag orders involved with Signal, they probably wouldn’t give regular law enforcement or courts any of the data they have.

            Really, my only problem is that with a centralized service, there’s no way to ever know for sure. There’s luckily no evidence of anything nefarious happening at least.