Unity Silently Deletes GitHub Repo that Tracks Terms of Service Changes and Updated Its License - eviltoast
  • yukichigai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, so even assuming that’s the case, “stopping distribution” is different than “we’re gonna charge you for installs of copies you’ve already sold”. Still not seeing how that’s legal.

    • Snarwin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Naturally they only get to charge for already-sold copies if you accept the new terms that include the charges. As for how it’s legal to include those charges in the new terms to begin with, I guess you’d have to ask a contract lawyer. Presumably Unity’s own lawyers are convinced they can get away with it, or they wouldn’t have done it.