Thoughts on RHEL going closed source ? - eviltoast

I’m curious about what you think on how it will affect the Linux community and distros (especially RHEL based distros like Fedora or Rocky).

  • digdilem@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who admins around 200 Rocky 8/9 and Centos 7 servers, this is a little concerning.

    But I have a lot of faith in Rocky and Alma, who are reportedly working together, in coming up with a solution to ensure they continue getting security fixes and updates.

    Redhat are steadily turning into every bit as anti-competitive and, well, evil, as Oracle used to be. It’s a shame as they used to do a lot for the FOSS world. Now they seem content to profit from it and give nothing back.

    • Carl George@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now they seem content to profit from it and give nothing back.

      This statement is completely false. Red Hat contributes a ton to open source, to thousands of upstream projects, probably more than any other individual company. Software from Red Hat acquisitions has been transitioned from closed to open source. New open source software is often created by Red Hat engineers. Everything Red Hat does is open source and contributed back upstream whenever possible.

      To be clear, me saying this is not an endorsement of the RHEL source export changes announced yesterday. I think that sucks. But it doesn’t undo everything else Red Hat does.