Hellfire103@lemmy.ca to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agodd: disk destroyerlemmy.caexternal-linkmessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1525arrow-down16cross-posted to: linuxhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1519arrow-down1external-linkdd: disk destroyerlemmy.caHellfire103@lemmy.ca to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square85fedilinkcross-posted to: linuxhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarelnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·10 days agoI don’t think so. Block device is a block device. Maybe you have better knowledge, please elaborate.
minus-squarekekmacska@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 days agoi know it from experience. When i wanted to install a modern Linux on a 2009 hdd, it installed, but simply refused to boot, even though hdsentinel said the hdd is 100℅ healthy
I don’t think so. Block device is a block device.
Maybe you have better knowledge, please elaborate.
i know it from experience. When i wanted to install a modern Linux on a 2009 hdd, it installed, but simply refused to boot, even though hdsentinel said the hdd is 100℅ healthy