Light-based “LiFi” is stunningly fast, notably fragile—and now standardized - eviltoast
  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The best application I can image would be using them in street lamps to offer consistent coverage in public spaces. Not sure how viable that would be cost wise though.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Covert communications could also be an application. Just need line of sight and a signal could be sent undetected, and if anyone or anything above a certain size gets on position to detect it, their detection would be observed by both sender and receiver. The attempt would likely be noticed even before the detection, so the signal could be stopped until whatever it is that’s looking moves on.

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wouldn’t it be far more effective just to put Wi-Fi routers in said street lamps though? You’d almost certainly need far fewer of them for the same coverage.

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Wi-Fi suffers from congestion due to everything using the same bands for everything. My understanding is that LiFi is not meant to replace Wi-Fi but to supplement it.